Welcome to Consumer Reports Advocacy

For 85 years CR has worked for laws and policies that put consumers first. Learn more about CR’s work with policymakers, companies, and consumers to help build a fair and just marketplace at TrustCR.org

CU comments on the National Organic Standards Board’s Spring 2017 meeting

Consumers Union, the policy and mobilization arm of Consumer Reports, welcomes the opportunity to submit written comments on the proposals and discussion documents for the spring 2017 meeting of the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) in Denver, Colorado.

Our vision is for consumers to have access to a safe, transparent, and sustainable food system that robustly supports human and environmental health.

One of our areas of focus is food labels, which should be clear, honest, and transparent. We evaluate and rate food labels, including the USDA Organic label, to empower consumers with knowledge to make better and more informed decisions when shopping for food. This information is available to consumers online at www.greenerchoices.org.

We appreciate the work of the NOSB and urge the board to:

  • Remove sodium phosphate from the National List, due to lack of essentiality and human health concerns;
  • Follow up on the previous work of the board on “nutrient vitamins and minerals” and prepare for removing this inappropriately interpreted listing from the National List;
  • Reject the petition to add short DNA tracers to the National List because they are produced using excluded methods and are not essential;
  • Clarify the proposal for marine algae listings to ensure the annotations specify the genus, especially for agar-agar;
  • Carefully review the inclusion of kymene and vinyl chloride in the list of ancillary substances for cellulose and prohibit their use.

We urge the Livestock Subcommittee to start working on a proposal to prohibit the use of all antibiotics at all stages of life for poultry, to ensure that the routine of use of antibiotics is consistently prohibited in organic production.

We also hope that the GMO/Materials Subcommittee will finish its work on updating excluded methods terminology, specifically to include the terms transposons, cisgenesis, intragenesis, and agro-infiltration as excluded methods.

For the full comments, click here.