Welcome to Consumer Reports Advocacy

Consumer Reports is an independent nonprofit organization that works for a fair, safe and transparent marketplace.

Since we were founded as Consumers Union in 1936, we have advocated for the rights of all consumers. Now, we are united under the Consumer Reports name, bringing together our trusted testing, research, journalism, and advocacy.

We hope you will partner with us and our six million members for a better world.

Consumers Union Letter to Congress on AT&T’s Proposed Purchase of T-Mobile

April 12, 2011

SUBJECT: AT&T’s Purchase of T-Mobile

Dear Senator,

Consumers Union, publisher of Consumer Reports, writes to share with you the results of a recent price analysis survey and a customer satisfaction survey. We believe the results of this analysis provide new and critical data that you should be aware of as the government begins its consideration of AT&T’s proposal to purchase T-Mobile.

These results underscore our concerns and the adverse impact this proposed transaction would have on consumers and the U.S. wireless market. A price analysis survey of the voice and data plans available from AT&T and T-Mobile demonstrates that T-Mobile wireless plans typically cost $15 to $50 less per month than comparable plans from AT&T.

That finding supports anecdotal observations that T-Mobile is generally a lower-priced carrier than AT&T. It also validates concerns that T-Mobile subscribers eventually migrating to AT&T plans could pay more for service than they would have under a T-Mobile plan—and that T-Mobile’s departure from the wireless market would eliminate a relatively low-cost carrier as an option for consumers.

Here are just a couple of examples of AT&T’s price disparities with T-Mobile:

  • T-Mobile charges $50 per month for its basic 1,000-minute individual “Even More Talk” two-year contract plan, while AT&T charges $60 per month for its nearest equivalent Nation contract plan, which includes only 900 minutes. Adjusting for the difference in voice minutes, AT&T costs $16.67 more per month or $200 more per year for a comparable monthly allocation of minutes.
  • The more you buy, the bigger the price disparity. T-Mobile’s two-line 3,000-minute “Even More Talk + Text” (unlimited messaging) + 200MB data two-year contract plan for smart phones costs $140 per month. The closest AT&T “FamilyTalk Nation” plan costs $170 per month, after you add data and messaging to the base price, but delivers only 2,100 voice minutes. Adjusted for the 900-voice-minute shortchange, this AT&T plan costs $50 more per month or $600 more per year.

In addition, consumers surveyed by Consumer Reports are consistently less satisfied with the service they get from AT&T than T-Mobile. Those findings, based on the responses of more than 50,000 Consumer Reports.org subscribers surveyed last fall, suggest the proposed merger of the two carriers would be a setback to T-Mobile customers were it to lead to service that more resembles AT&T’s servie than T-Mobile’s service.

Specifically, the survey results showed:

  • Though ranked lower than Verizon and Sprint, T-Mobile was still meaningfully better than AT&T at providing service without a contract plan. AT&T got lower marks than T-Mobile on almost every attribute respondents rated, save for problems with texting, where it was comparable with T-Mobile.
  • The gap between AT&T and T-Mobile was larger still for service without a contract, via so-called “prepaid” plans. There, T-Mobile was more satisfying overall than Verizon, Virgin, and AT&T (with its Go Phone prepaid brand). Only Tracfone and Consumer Cellular ranked higher than T-Mobile’s “prepaid” service.
  • City by city, for both contract and no-contract service, T-Mobile was meaningfully more satisfying than AT&T in 20 of the 21 cities in which there was sufficient data to rate both carriers. T-Mobile also had notably fewer problems with dropped calls than AT&T.

We urge you to take this important information into account as Congress, the Justice Department and the Federal Communications Commission consider the proposed merger.

Respectfully Submitted,

Parul P. Desai

Policy Counsel